tasting

Showing posts with label tasting. Show all posts
SmokyBeast leads a charity tasting!!!

April 15, 2016

SmokyBeast leads a charity tasting!!!

For anyone in the New York City area, we're working with our friends at Xavier Wine Co., to sponsor a charity auction to raise money for Promise Project.

We'll be doing a whiskey tasting for up to 8 people at the gorgeous tasting room at Xavier Wines, featuring some awesome and rare whiskies.






About Promise Project

GOAL at PROMISE PROJECT is that all children with learning disabilities get the chance to succeed.

THE PROMISE is to provide an educational path for underserved children who struggle with learning disabilities, evaluating their learning disabilities and getting them the support they need.



Learn more at: http://www.promise-project.org/promise/


CLICK HERE TO BID OR DONATE!
Happy Hollow Oldest Reserve - Bourbon Past vs Present Part Two

August 25, 2015

Happy Hollow Oldest Reserve - Bourbon Past vs Present Part Two

For bourbon fanatics, you can't get better than a bottle that's been hiding on the back shelf of a liquor store gathering dust for thirty years. Why are these dusties so treasured? Are they really that good? This past Spring, we teamed up with Jim Parisi of Xavier Wine Company in Manhattan's Meat Packing District to find out. Bourbon Past vs. Present was born. Two new and two dusty bourbons fought it out including Old Taylor 86 from the late 1970's against the new EH Taylor Barrel Proof, and a 1973 Old Forester Bottled in Bond against the new Old Forester Birthday Bourbon.  The winner, by a landslide, was the 1973 Old Forester BIB.  For Bourbon Past vs. Present Part Two, we wanted to up the ante and find an even earlier bottle.



A Mystery

As Jim was putting the word out that we might be planning a sequel, a friend of his sent us a picture of a very rare old bottle of bourbon that he'd purchased at an auction some years ago. He volunteered to let this bottle go for our tasting and we accepted, not sure exactly what we'd gotten our hands on, but excited nonetheless. This is it:




Oldest Reserve

What we do know about this bottle (because it's written on the label) is that it was distilled in 1953 and bottled at 15 years old (presumably in 1968), that it's bottled at an interesting 101 proof, that it was distilled in Kentucky and bottled by the "Happy Hollow Distilling Company" in Lawrenceburg.




While this seems like some good information, it's not very much to go on. This bottle is not really a "dusty" since it was a special limited release and not most likely not generally available to gather dust in liquor stores. So none of our dusty hunter friends could help us identify the source.

Old Happy Hollow

There doesn't seem to be anything we could find called "Old Happy Hollow Distilling Company".  This isn't unusual since just like today, many brands pop up and bottle whiskey from various distilleries and give themselves interesting names (see Black Maple Hill). The signature dripping red wax hints at Maker's Mark. So we explored connections between Maker's and Happy Hollow.  And we found some...




Bill Samuels started Maker's Mark in 1953 (1953!) when he purchased the Burks Spring Distillery, which was originally named Happy Hollow Distillery because of its location in Happy Hollow, Kentucky. Here's an awesome picture of the reopening of the Burks Spring Distillery that also refers to the site as Happy Hollow.  We found the excellent Maker's Mark collector site No Broken Drips (by the way we love seeing this kind of dedication to a brand!  go guys!!). While they didn't have Oldest Reserve listed as a Maker's Mark bottling, they did note that Burks Spring Distillery used to produce a bourbon called Old Happy Hollow.

There's a lot of marketing hype about the origins of Maker's Mark. Supposedly Bill Samuels destroyed the old family bourbon recipe and (in lieu of doing a run of test distillations) took eight different mashbills and baked a loaf of bread with each one. (Hard to see how there's a grain of truth in that, but whatever). One of the recipes he'd borrowed from Julian "Pappy" Van Winkle, which substituted wheat for rye as the second ingredient. Supposedly this mix made the best loaf of bread and the rest is history. Meanwhile Bill's wife Margie was busy melting wax in the family's deep fryer and coming up with the signature bottle design.

Whatever truth or exaggeration exists in the history of the brand, we know that Bill did own the distillery previously known as Happy Hollow in 1953 and he was starting to establish a new company. However, if the above picture is accurate, they made their first barrel of whiskey in 1954, it's doubtful that Oldest Reserve was actually distilled by the Samuels Maker's Mark crew. In most cases when a distillery changes hands, part of the deal is to acquire existing stocks of whiskey. Is it possible that Samuels purchased old stocks of Happy Hollow / Burks Spring bourbon and then later bottled them?  This theory does seem consistent with the statement on the bottle "from the few remaining barrels of a very rare stock distilled in Kentucky... by the Happy Hollow Distilling Company."

Ok well enough theory, we still honestly have no idea what this stuff is, who cares let's drink it.




Tasting Notes

Nose: This doesn't have the mustiness that we associate with old bourbon. Perhaps due to the pristine condition the bottle was in?  Maybe is was cellared for many years and not exposed to a lot of heat or sunlight?  In any case it gives the nose of a nice high-rye bourbon.  Definitely not a wheater.  Well we knew that since they didn't start making wheated bourbon until 1954. Maybe it was some of the old stock of Burks Spring / Happy Hollow.  Ok back to what we know: the nose has a very nice combination of spice (high-rye bourbon) and sweetness. There's buttered corn, there's anise (black Twizzlers?), there's Worcestershire Sauce, rose water, fresh wet grass, char, cayenne pepper, a hint of brine - pickled okra, cologne.  A lot of layers coming out of this nose which at first seemed straightforward.  With 15 minutes to open up, (how did we not notice it before), there's that musty old bourbon quality. Skunky, funky, roll-it-up-and-smoke-it nose that we get from certain beloved bottles...

Palate: Very lovely. It stays perfectly balanced coming in on the tongue with rye spice, meeting the sides of the mouth with sweet green apples, and giving a hint of dry wood and the top of the throat.

Finish: Dry finish, punchy and delicious. You can still taste the spirit for sure, but there's a great drinkability here and a deep integration of heat, spice, sweet, and wood that all come together. Again it tastes nothing like a wheater, but like some of the great traditional bourbons that we've tasted from this era. There's a touch of oaky bitterness on the end of the finish that's maybe technically a flaw but still enjoyable.  Very unique bourbon that would be tough to confuse with modern day sauce.  What a treat!


Thanks to Jim for hosting another great tasting! Do you have any ideas / requests for Past vs Present Part Three? Let us know and we'll try to make it happen.  Cheers/SB


Rye Battle Royale Part II

May 18, 2015

Rye Battle Royale Part II

When we left off last week, we had just participated in an epic tasting battle between Willett Bonili 24-Year 94 Proof (aka Willett 24/94) and Michter's 6J-1 10-Year Rye.  The Michter's eeked out a slim, but noticeable and unanimous victory.  It was so incredibly rich, warm, spicy, and full-flavored that we'd put it in the top 3 ryes we've ever tasted.  (Wish we had some LeNell's Red Hook Rye Barrel #1 to compare it to!!).

Just as we were wrapping up this incredibly enjoyable conclusion, our guest beasts - The Zuckman Brothers, started to break out some serious big guns.  We quickly went from two bad-ass rye legends to an entire table.  Here's how things looked:

Willett 24/94 & Michter's 6J-1
Black Maple Hill 23 Year Single Barrel Rye
Vintage 21 Year Rye
Hirsch 25 Year Rye

There were a couple of others too, a Rittenhouse 23 Year, and a Hirsch 22 Year.  There were pigs-in-blankets with Gulden's Spicy Brown mustard.  Really not a bad lineup all-in-all.  Here's what they all looked like together.


Ok so let's get down to some serious business.

First impressions:  After we got over the sheer ludicrousness of the task in front of us, we started to slowly taste through the table.  Right away we all noticed that there was something wrong with the Hirsch 22.  It must have been left out in the sun or had a bad cork or something, because this is a pretty legendary bottle and tasted straight up bad.  So we're assuming this was not a fair test of Hirsch 22 and we won't comment on it further.

We remember Black Maple Hill 23 as being the first super-aged rye that we ever tried.  We bought one in 2008 for $105.  It was so good we went back and bought another one, this time the price was $125.  Then we went back for a third, but the price had risen to $160.  Too rich for our blood, we thought back then and we didn't make the purchase.  Who would have thought that seven years later these bottles sell for $1,600 each!!  We should have bought a case at $160...

Second impressions:  We strongly suspect that the Michter's, Black Maple Hill, Willett, and Vintage 21 are all from the same source and from similar batches.  They're peas in a pod, very similar, all insanely delicious, and probably difficult to tell apart if you weren't tasting them side-by-side.  The Rittenhouse and the Hirsch, on the other hand, were obviously different recipes / sources.  They had completely different taste profiles.

Third impressions:  Within the four that we're now suspecting to be KBD-sourced juice there were some definite variations and subtleties to the taste.  The Michter's was still the unanimous favorite.  We took turns leaving the room and then blind tasting the Michter's against some of the other bottles, and it was still 100% chosen as the best, even just from the nose.  The Rittenhouse was the sweetest, and had less of the classic rye spice to it.  This pushed it higher for some and lower for others.

Ok, so for the results, here is Jared with his picks:

J-Zuck puts the Ritt up at #2!

And Brett:
B-Money Likes-A-Da-Willettz

The SmokyBeast final scoring went like this:

  1. Michter's 6J-1  (even blind this one was just so huge and awesome!)
  2. Willett 24/94 (This one is still such a truly awesome bottle)
  3. Vintage 21  (Extremely close in nose/palate to the Willett, have to put them together)
  4. Black Maple Hill 23 (Tasting this bottle after all these years was awesome, it's really amazing but just a tiny bit flat/waxy next to the others)
  5. Rittenhouse 23  (Still one of our all-time favorites, we just had to give the others preference because they're so very RYE!  If you told us the Rittenhouse was a superb bourbon we might fall for it.  Not that that's a bad thing...)
  6. Hirsch 25 (Very interesting and complex bottle here, just lacking some of the vitality and vigor of the others.  The spice gets a little lost in the wood here and it's just a bit over-oaked.)
We had two other guest judges who decided to remain anonymous due to the extremely high profile of SmokyBeast and their fear of being constantly plagued by paparazzi and written up in gossip columns.  But the results were very similar, the Michter's, Willett, and Vintage 21 were the statistical favorites in that order, with some mixture of BMH and Ritt in the next spots.  

That's all for now.  Where do you go from here??  Any requests for our next review?  Let us know if any of you have tasted these bottles and share your thoughts / tasting notes in the comments.  

Cheers!  /SB



Rye Battle Royale - Willett 24/94 vs Michter's 6J-1

May 11, 2015

Rye Battle Royale - Willett 24/94 vs Michter's 6J-1

When the Zuckman brothers arrived bearing matching bulletproof briefcases handcuffed to their wrists, we knew there would be trouble.  You see the Zuckmans - Brett the elder and young buck Jared, are notorious in certain circles for their very specific set of skills.  These include sniping estate sales, swooping in on auctions, and adhering themselves to the rear grills of Van Winkle delivery trucks to track down "unicorn" whiskey bottles.  If there's a Hirsch wax top slowly sinking in the Hudson river, you can bet that Jared is twenty feet below in a wetsuit honing in on that sucker with side-scan radar and Brett is rolling up from starboard in one of those crab boats from Deadliest Catch.

The Zuckman Brothers (artistic rendering)

"Holy Shit!"

...was how eloquently hubby put it when he turned the bottle around and looked at the label.  He'd just seen a ghost.  Or as close to a ghost as there is in the whiskey business.


Let's take a step back.  If you're a loyal reader, you're familiar with our penchant for (read: obsession with) Michter's 10-Year Rye.  The ryes released under this label from 2007 to 2011 were incredibly special, rumored to have been bottled for Michter's by Julian Van Winkle.  The barrel numbers like "7B-2" and "8K-1" referred to the year of release (2007) and the batch.  We found that the farther back you go, the more amazing the bottle tastes.  The 7B-2 was some of the best rye we'd ever tasted and held it's weight back to back with some of our absolute favorites like Willett 25 Year.  We'd heard rumors that there were even earlier releases of Michter's 10 Year Rye, from before 2007, but had never seen one in the flesh...  until now.



Ninja Battle

So, in the presence of such a legend, what kind of warrior could we unleash in our corner?  Luckily we'd saved the last inch of our Willett 24/94 (the victor in our recent "big willett tasting").  This beauty, from the epic 1984 distillation, has been at the top of our rye list for some time.




Let The Battle Begin!




Nose to nose:

Willett 24/94:  Just from the first sip it's everything we remember it being.  Rich, vanilla, spice, leather, super alive.  Little explosions of too many things to note but to give it another shot: palm fronds, bananas, saddle leather, brandied cherries, Cohiba cigars (real Cubans of course, not that DR crap), more vanilla, like slicing open fresh vanilla beans.  Like filling a bathtub with Häagen-Dazs vanilla ice cream and soaking in it.

Michter's 6J-1:  "Holy shit..." is uttered again.  It's not quite as bright as the Willett, but if it's possible it's even richer.  All those things above, minus some of the bananas, plus a big ole dab of molasses bbq sauce.  If the other one made us want to fill up a bathtub with it and soak for hours, this one makes us want to rent a houseboat and live in there, just circumnavigating the basin of the glencairn glass over and over as we drift into old age.

Taste to taste:

Willett: Ok malt whisky was our first love.  Lagavulin, Talisker, those smoky peaty beauties that live in your nostrils for decades after you finish the glass.  But right now, if we're talking desert island decisions, we'd have to put down scotch and bring a case of this stuff.  It's just pulls you in so hard.  The spice, the mouthfeel, it's super warm and mellow, not a trace of burn, but at the same time so completely alive with none of the over-woodedness or sour oak that some super aged American whiskies have.  And the finish: just perfect.  Crisp with spice floating across the nose and throat and a layer of honey and black licorice that slowly recedes back from the tip of the tongue.

Michters:  And again, we barely would have thought it possible, but it's all those things and just a little more.  An oily thickness on the tongue with less honey and more viscosity.  It's a few shades darker and you can taste that color.  Just a drop thicker, warmer, more subtle, maybe a tad more towards bourbon in the way that the richness builds up into a heat.  Not an alcohol heat, but a sensory heat of flavors all coming together right at the top of your throat.  The Michter's is the victor in this battle, if only by a hair, but it was unanimous.  We all agreed there was just something decidedly Kardashian about DAT MICHTER'S that just slaughtered it.  We'd still rob you blind if you were walking down the street with a Willett 24/94, but for the Michter's we'd add some kind of deadly weapon.

Damn

"Damn, Zuckman's, that was a pretty epic throw down.  Guess we'll catch you on the flip side."

"You think we're done?" asks Brett.

"We're just getting warmed up," adds Jared.  And some new bottles come out of those briefcases.


Oh man a Vintage 21!  This is another Willett / Kentucky Bourbon Distillers bottling from the mid-2000's that's now a total collector's item.  And then...


A Hirsch 25 rye!  This one's been on our short list as we've never tried it before.  Getting massively excited.  But wait, is that...  Yes, yes I think it is...


A Black Maple Hill 23!  Another KBD bottle this time for Black Maple Hill, the insanely coveted BMH23 now sells on the black market for upwards of $1,600.

Well now it's an all out Rye Wrestlemania!  (Ryestlemania??)  This is too much to handle right now.  Tune in next week for the results.

Cheers/SB
Bourbon Past vs Present

March 27, 2015

Bourbon Past vs Present

Our friend Jim Parisi has recently opened Xavier Wine Company in the meat-packing district.  It's a small store with a friendly vibe that has a great hand-picked selection of wine and spirits.  We've been working with Jim on building a whiskey selection and audience.  (Right now there is some construction out front, but don't let it deter you from finding the front door, they're open!!!).



Jim reached out to us about doing a whiskey tasting and we wanted to break the ice with something really special.  We called our homie Josh Feldman from CooperedTot to brainstorm ideas.  We wanted to feature some gems from our personal collections as well as some favorite new whiskies that would soon be available at Xavier.  The concept of a "Past vs. Present" tasting was born.


We ended up with two expressions of Old Forester: A beauty of a 1973/1979 Bottled-in-Bond handle versus a 2014 Old Forester Birthday Bourbon (OFBB being one of our favorite limited releases, of which admittedly 2014 was not the best year); and an Old Taylor 1978 vs the new EH Taylor Barrel Proof (another favorite).


We debated long and hard about the order to present them in.  We knew that the EH Taylor, coming in at a whopping 129 proof, should be last.  We wanted the old and new bourbons to be next to each other.  But we figured that the '73 Forester BIB would be the star of the show.

The narrative of the tasting led us to the above lineup.  Josh came in with some amazing history lessons.  Bourbon used to be sold directly to saloons in barrels.  The problem with that was that the proprietors could dilute and tamper with the contents.  The "Bottled-in-Bond" concept was to seal each bottle with a stamp guaranteeing its authenticity.  This raised the overall quality of the bourbon industry and also allowed Brown-Forman to produce a "medical grade" bourbon product so that they could stay in business during Prohibition.

The story led to Colonel EH Taylor, a historical figure (nephew of President Zachary Taylor) who established "The Castle" distillery near Frankfort, KY. Taylor was a pioneer of the modern whiskey industry and his story takes us all the way to Buffalo Trace, the current producer of EH Taylor which today is one of the most prolific distillers of bourbon (see Pappy Van Winkle, George T Stagg, Weller, Taylor, etc.).  Showcasing the EH Taylor Barrel proof was a nod to the recent trend of over-proofed bourbons that are wow'ing our taste buds in the 21st Century.

1973 Old Forester BIB vs OFBB


Well it wasn't a big surprise that this wasn't much of a contest.  The '73 had a rich, dark, sightly musty, flavor backed up with massive vanilla, oak, and molasses that totally blew away the OFBB.  By contract the Birthday Bourbon seemed thin and hot, with more spice but nowhere near the body.  A solid victory for the old bourbon...

Old Taylor vs EH Taylor Barrel Proof


It was a reversal of fortune on the Taylors, with the new EHTBP winning most of the votes.  In hindsight it wasn't really fair to pit the old 80 proofer against the monster 129 proof modern day version, but on the other hand, they didn't bottle barrel proof bourbon back then, so it's a good statement on how tastes have changed.

Fierce Debate

The best part about this was the awesome crowd, who really seemed to appreciate how unique it was to taste 40 years of bourbon side by side.  There were a lot of great questions, some animated discussion, differences of opinion, and a few new friends made along the way.

Thanks so so much to everyone who joined us and made our first tasting a big success!

Cheers/SB
Fortune Smiles On The Beast - Disco Drams Part 4

July 17, 2013

Fortune Smiles On The Beast - Disco Drams Part 4

Once in a while the angels blow their trumpets, the clouds part, and the planets align.  We're talking about when WPIX does a weekend Honeymooners marathon;  When you get a refund from the IRS; Or when you get invited to a private tasting on the Brooklyn waterfront complete with rare scotch, fine cigars, and a dinosaur-sized slab of prime rib.

Our hosts: Norm Brodsky -  entrepreneur, author, and whiskey aficionado; and Rob Levin - CEO & publisher of The New York Enterprise Report.  The setting: a steamy sunset over the Manhattan skyline.  The subject at hand: a nineteen-man vote on three vintage malts.

Let the games begin...

Brooklyn Sunset


Contender #1: Signatory Vintage Craigduff 1973 Cask Strength

Some history from our friends at RoyalMile:  "Craigduff was distilled at the nearby Glen Keith distillery. Lightly peated barley from Glen Keith maltings was used in conjunction with controlled amounts of concentrated peated water, being added to each wash charge. Peated water was brought in 45 gallon drums from Stornaway, on fishing boats into the port of Buckie. The peated water was run through the small still at Glen Keith, which was coupled to an angled condenser to concentrate the peatiness in the remaining water. We understand the drive behind the experimental distillation came from a sister company in Japan. Apparently, during the course of the experiment, a sample of the concentrated peated water, whilst en route to Japan, was intercepted at Heathrow airport by Customs Officials who were convinced it was whisky in disguise, and decanted a fair bit of the drum before realising, too late, that it was in fact just water."

Tasting notes from Master of Malt: 
Nose: Toffee and supple sherry, a little dry oak, cocoa and soft wood smoke drifting up from an oak fire with a sprig of rosemary thrown in for good measure. Quite a bit of sweetness too.
Palate: Gently sweet, cedar, maple syrup and chocolate. Coffee beans, herbal and intense.
Finish: Good length with hints of peat smoke and tar on the finish, with a big whack of barley malt.

SB notes:  This was a dream of a dram.  Warm and full with perfect sweetness.  Despite the experimental peating process, it didn't taste particularly peaty.  The sherry and wood were out front with an excellent balance of warmth and sweetness and just a hint of smoke.  It was thick and substantial in texture and had a superbly smooth finish with wood, smoke, and fruit.


Contender #2: Samaroli Glenlivet 1977 Coilltean

Notes from PartySource: "My roots in Glenlivet date to the late 1980s, when the standard issue Glenlivet 12-year-old was a healthy 86 proof and redolent of a peachy-malt delicacy nearly unrivaled on the Spey. I'm pleased to find in this 1977 distillation (which date corresponds roughly to my first tastes of the brand) glancing reminders of those glorious first sips of Glenlivet's special nectar. In this case, it culminates in a crescendo of Speyside perfection. The peach-pear-oak quality is more stylish than ever, brought to an ineffably pretty, classic Livet palate. After 33+ years in wood, the dram is superbly fresh." -Jay Erisman

Tasting notes from Wine&CheesePlace: "With a traditional character, unleashes intense concentrated aromas. The slow development in the glass makes it mysterious and surprising, definitely very satisfying from a hedonistic point of view. Dry prunes, tamarind, toffee pear, leather, raisins, developed tones of vanilla and many other aromas follow in succession with a long aromatic persistence. Embracing on the palate, with considerable delicacy and elegance, a perfect match between nose and palate. Superlative and unrivalled, of very rare quality.


SB notes:  This was a very delicate lady with lots of sweet cake and vanilla, some soft citrus, and white oak.  Perhaps we should have tasted it before the 'Duff since it was much more subtle.  Not dissimilar to Scapa, but even more refined with the 34 year age - it was elegant and dangerously smooth.

Contender #3: The Highland Park 30 Year 




Notes from MasterofMalt: "The nose is full and rich. Some floral notes develop with hints of acacia honey. Dark toffee with honeycomb and notes of juicy sultana. There are some date notes with a touch of sugary fresh pastry. The palate is warm and rich. Notes of winter spice and sherried raisins, hints of mixed peels and manuka honey sweetness. A little mocchaccino note lies somewhere in the mix with a little rum. The finish is long with toasty oaked spice."

Official notes from Highland Park: "Highland Park 30 Year Old merits time and attention. It has spent 30 years maturing so treat it with respect; you’ll discover the characteristic fudge sweetness together with complex aromatic spices and dark chocolate orange. It has a drying finish, leaving a gentle smoky flavour and a mildly salty aftertaste – the result of 30 years ageing in the Orkney sea spray."




SB notes:  What a way to finish the pack!  This had everything we look for in a top-flight scotch.  Smooth, crisp smokiness, big wood flavors, and - yes - "fudge sweetness" is an accurate descriptor.  It just oozed that "men's club leather" character that is so desirable in a malt.  The longest finish of the three with all the notes coming together: savory, smoky, and full of dark fruits.


And The Winner Is...

Heading straight to a vote after we finished the third "taste" (they were really more like 3/4 of a full pour!), it was so difficult to decide between the Craigduff and the Highland.  The 'Duff was definitely the most unique and different malt, the peat and sweet coming in at unexpected angles.  The Highland was just straight brilliance with outrageous flavor and drinkability.  Without time for reflection one vote went to the Highland.  It was impossible to find anything wrong with it, and while the 'Duff won hands-down for creativity, a little more smoke might have pulled us over.  Our host Norm sided with 'Duff.

Glasses raised in the air for the big vote (drum roll please....)

Craigduff: 8
Glenlivet: 2
Highland Park: 9

So the Highland took it by one vote!  It turned out that our rash decision could have swung it either way.  Honestly it was too close to call.  With a little more time (maybe 2 or 3 more glasses) we could easily have been pulled over to the big 'Duff.  Either way they were both remarkable, memorable beasts and it sure was an enjoyable contest.  

Oh and did we mention that these three beauties were just the beginning?  



Until next time.  /SmokyBeast