Michter's 10-Year Rye Vertical

July 29, 2014

Michter's 10-Year Rye Vertical


Zen & The Art of Light Bulb Maintenance  

"How many whiskey snobs does it take to change a light bulb?" 
"One hundred.  One to screw in the new bulb, and ninety-nine to explain why the old one was better."

Back in October, 2013, SmokyBeast tested a hypothesis.  Michter's had been releasing different batches of their 10-Year Bourbon over a number of years from 2007 to 2013.  The common wisdom in the whiskey community was that the old batches put the new stuff to shame.  There were even murmurings that the original barrels had been sourced from Stitzel-Weller, the legendary stomping grounds of Julian "Pappy" Van Winkle, Sr.  Anyone professing to enjoy the new Michter's bourbon (for which they had just shelled out almost a hundred bucks) was quickly chastised and corrected by the nearest available whiskey snob, who would point out that they'd thrown away their money on crap that was unfit to water their flowers.

Well we happened to like the new Michter's 10-Year, as a matter of fact it was one of our current favorites.  We'd never tried the mythical original releases, so we set out to obtain all the various batches and taste them blind.  We would see if there was any substance to the social media vitriol, or if this was simply a case of smarmy light bulb changers.  You can see the results here.  In a nutshell, while there were noticeable differences in the old batches versus the new one (old was more woody, new was sweeter) we felt the high quality had carried through to the new product.

As regular readers know, we're huge rye whiskey fans.  And sadly during the first two years of SmokyBeast's existence, Michter's had ceased to produce a 10-Year Rye.  We heard some rumblings that a new Michter's 10-Year Rye would be coming out this summer, and lo-and-behold we were able to score a bottle.  But could the new rye hold up to the old stuff as well as the bourbon did?  Was there a reason that they stopped producing it for four years?  Well, once more unto the breach dear friends, we have assembled all the known bottlings and are ready to get to the bottom of...

Going Vertical Part 2: Michter's 10-Year Rye!




First of all we need to thank our man in Tennessee, Eric Jorgensen, for being as obsessive about this stuff as we are and graciously packaging up samples of not one but all three old M10 Rye batches for us!  It's good to have friends in high places!

2007, 2008, 2011 Michter's 10-Year Ryes being packed up for the Beast Tasting!

Off To The Races...

Our special guest for this round was Jason Laschewer, father-to-be (congrats J!!!), Brooklynite, brown liquor lover.  Armed with our trusty Glencairn crystal, four ample pours of Michter's, and a good old fashioned NYC sausage & peppers pizza, we set to work.


Michter's 10-Year Rye 7B-2 (First Release, 2007)






First Release: 7B-2 (2007)









Mrs. B.: Michter's always gives me a maple syrup, earthy, sweet but mellow taste.  That shiz is good!

Mr B.:  Ok right out of the gate this stuff just oozes good rich rye on the nose.  Brown butter, molasses, big spice, cloves, and nutmeg.  This is just how we remembered it - wood, sweet, spice, it's all there.  On the palate it's very smooth, warm sweet, hefty dose of char, loving this stuff!

J.L.:  Burnt caramel, buttery, syrup - a heavy, rich flavor but smooth and sweet all the way.






2nd Release: 8L-1 (2008)






J.L.: Sharper on the nose.  On the palate, full flavor up front which finishes flatter than the 2007.  It's not as smooth or complex as the 2007, but still tasty, with bit of heat.

Mr. B.:  Less sweet, more bbq, not as much butter/molasses, more spice and heat.  Much sharper than the '07 on the tongue, little sour note at the end.  It's still mighty good, but not quite as great as the 7.

Mrs. B.:  Not as smooth as the '07.  A little bit sweeter with cotton candy but much more of a burn to it.  Deceiving because the color is a bit darker, but the 2007 was richer.






3rd Release: 11DR-4 (2011)









Note: We all noticed immediately that this was by far the darkest of the four.

J.L.:  Sweet but subtle corn flavor up front, cherry/woody finish with a bit of undefined fruitiness. Apricot? Delicious!  Leaps and bounds ahead of 2008 but a few steps behind 2007.

Mrs. B.:  A combination of the two.  The mellow sweetness with a little of the burn.  Really good!  Crisper, flavors are a little more defined, come together more.  The 2007 is still my favorite with the 2011 coming in second.

Mr. B.:  Deep dark and delicious on both the color and the nose.  It's the richest and most complex by a wide margin.  Lots of different wood flavors coming out, it's still got all the sweets and spices, and everything marries together brilliantly.  On the tongue - yup, it's the sweetest and the spiciest.  As it opens up I get black licorice, barbecue sauce, smoked meat...  It's a close call between the '07 and the '11, but in the end, the 11 is my pony!  Very rich and beautiful dram!







4th Release: 14C168 (2014)







Note: By far the lightest of the four, this stuff looks about 40% less dark and lovely than the older batches.

Mrs. B.:  <shaking head> No comment.

Mr. B.: Wow you can just tell right from the nose that this is not in the same league.  It has none of the richness and depth of the others, smells hot and sort of watery at the same time.  On the tongue my disappointment continues, it's got an apple juice quality, like that of a much younger spirit that suffers from lack of flavor and too much heat at the same time.

J.L.: There are hints of vanilla, but it's a one-note flavor, one-trick pony if you will.  There's a clear lack of complexity and definition in the flavor.  Not in the same ballpark, or even the same league as the others.



Conclusions

I guess now we're the snobs yelling about the old light bulb!

We had some difference of opinion on which old bottle was most awesome.  JL & Mrs. Beast both went with the 2007 as their favorite, which was the sweetest, and the purest of the three.  Mr. Beast went with the 2011, the most complex one that opened up with layer after layer of flavor.  All were great ryes, deep and rich and flavorful.  Perhaps more than the stated 10 years of age?  They stand up to much older ryes that we've tasted in the past.  But there was no doubt that the 2014 completely paled in comparison to all of these original bad boys.  It was totally lacking that richness, that flavor, that eye-opening rye beauty.  Sad.

Battle 2014

Ok, so the new batch ain't so sweet compared to the old stuff. But, you may be thinking, "Back in 2007 I could walk out to the neighborhood liquor store and buy Pappy Van Winkle, Black Maple Hill, and basically any incredible American whiskey my little heart desired.  Thanks Beasts for ruining a perfectly good new rye that I was hoping to enjoy!  How, may I ask, does it hold up to anything I might be able to actually get my hands on in the present tense?"

Good question!  Rather than just bashing it with old glories, we figured we'd do a fair test next to a contemporary choice.  Since the new M10 Rye comes in at over $100, it actually wasn't easy to find anything to compare it to.  We ended up with our big hit from a couple of weeks ago, Smooth Ambler Single Barrel 8-Year Rye.  It's cask strength, so it's maybe not a totally fair comparison.  But at the same time it's $50 less expensive, so who's fault is it that the Michter's ain't cask strength too???  Let's line 'em up!




J.L.:  "To use a beer analogy, the Michters 10yr 2014 tastes like Miller Genuine Draft compared to Smooth Ambler's Dogfish 90 Minute IPA."  The nose on the Smooth Ambler has a funky spice - almost like tumeric/indian food/curry.  There's a bit of heat, bit of cherry/stone fruit, but overall it's surprisingly drinkable for 63.4%!  Really no comparison here.

All our notes were similar, so we'll stick with J.L.'s awesome beer analogy.  Basically the word "trounced" comes to mind.
verb past tense: trounced; past participle of: trounce  - to defeat heavily in a contest.
"the Knicks trounced the Rockets on Sunday"
(Clearly THAT definition was written 20 years ago...)

How Good is Good?

Ok we're done panning the new Michter's.  Next question, is the old stuff really that good?  Let's take our favorite of the old Michter's and put it against one of our current favorites: Willett Family Estate 25-Year Rye.




J.L. on Michter's 2007 vs. Willett 25

"Wow the Willett is so rich, just so huge in flavor.  It's a full two shades darker than the darkest of the Michters'.  It's almost syrupy, so thick and the mouthfeel is amazing.  However, I still think the Michter's 2007 is the best thing I've tasted tonight."

Mrs. B. on Michter's 2007 vs. Willett 25

"I was thinking in my head 'Oh this is no competition, I'm going to like the Willett.'  I love me some Willett and I've never had one that I didn't take to immediately.  However the Michter's surpasses it.  It's smoother, it has a lot of sweetness, but not too much.  Let's just say I wouldn't kick the Willett out of bed, but the Michter's '07 is insane."

Mr. B. On Michter's 2011 vs. Willett 25

"The noses could be sisters.  Is it remotely possible they were from the same source?  Really close, but the Willett takes the prize for amazing stand-out aroma.  They both are so tasty, this is one of the most difficult head-to-heads in recent memory.  At the end of the day, the Willett is just a little sour on the finish.  Perhaps tasting the Michter's points out that the Willett is a bit over-wooded, maybe just a tad past it's prime.  As much as I love Willett, I have to admit that the Michter's 11 just inches it out with a little more freshness and livelihood.  They're both spectacular, but I agree that the old Michter's wins.  But I bet that some of the Willett rye private barrels are better!"

Peanut Gallery

Alright so maybe we can't tell that joke anymore.  Sometimes the old stuff really is better, a lot, better than what's on the shelf today.  This may be particularly true for NDP's (non-distillery producers) who rely on sourcing whiskey from the market.  Seven years ago there was no market for high quality rye, so it was probably easy to get choice picks of well aged barrels.  Today, not so much.  The good news is that there are a lot of good things on the horizon.  Willett is making rye again, High West is doing a lot of cool things with barreling, Smooth Ambler is kicking out amazing private barrels left and right, so enjoy those old ryes if you get the chance and look forward to the new wave of American whiskey resurgence.

Thanks again to Jorgensen for the hook up and JL for guest judging.  Stay tuned for more fight-to-the-death showdown battles this summer!

Cheers/SB
Rock-Rock-Rockaway Beach Tasting!  Parker's Heritage 27-Year, Brora Jewels of Scotland, Hirsch Canadian Rye, Vintage 17 Bourbon

July 22, 2014

Rock-Rock-Rockaway Beach Tasting! Parker's Heritage 27-Year, Brora Jewels of Scotland, Hirsch Canadian Rye, Vintage 17 Bourbon


"Chewing out a rhythm on my bubble gum 
The sun is out and I want some
It's not hard, not far to reach
We can hitch a ride to Rockaway Beach..."


Sometimes living in the city you forget how far a quick car ride can take you.  This weekend we remembered that New York City is actually a beach town!  The weather was absolutely stunning and we motored out to Far Rockaway at the invitation of friends Reuven & Ilana Weinstein (who's taste in all things whiskey is hard to beat).  Cruising through outer Brooklyn, the old clunking ferris wheel and parachute rides of Coney Island could have been right out of the 1920's.



The tasting lineup was easy on the eyes as well...




Jewels of Scotland - Brora - Distilled 1982, Bottled 2004


This is the first Brora we've reviewed on SmokyBeast.  Brora is arguably the most collectible single malt in the world.  It was a distillery in the Scottish Highlands that was closed down in 1983.  Since then many have ranked Brora as the best Highland malt ever made.  It's lightly peated (they did make highly peated scotch for blends in the early 1970's, but the majority of single malts released were lightly peated, highland style).

We made sure to taste this beauty early in the night before the palate was overwhelmed with different tastes.  While the bottle specifically mentions peat, there was hardly any peat detectable (we also didn't get "peppery" or "mustard" as it says on the bottle...).  What we did get was a rich balance of honey, leather, musk, grass, and oak.  Very lovely, just sort of dancing on the tongue.  This is a very delicate lady, certainly not a smoky beast, but an immaculately crafted malt that balances spirit, oak, aromatics and sweetness into a real masterpiece.  If you get the chance to try Brora and you like Highland malt, it will likely be a memorable experience.

Parker's Heritage Collection Second Release, 27-Year Bourbon


When we saw this gem on the table there were wicked grins all around.  The second release from the Parker's Heritable Collection is a legendary bourbon, some of the most sought-after sauce Heaven Hill has ever put in a bottle.

It was one of those glasses that we wanted to jump into and swim around for a few hours.  We spent a good half hour nosing it and taking tiny sips to try and savor the glory.  It's right up there with the best bourbons we've ever tasted - Stitzel Weller Pappy Van Winkle, Four Roses Limited Edition, you name it.  Deep rich vanilla, cocoa, molasses, bbq spices, brown butter, huge wood char and spice.  (high amount of rye in the recipe?  it's got that awesome rye boldness!)  The palate is amazingly not over-oaked considering its venerable age, and the finish is uber-smooth.  Just a pure gem, if we did numbers, this would be a 96!  It's like drinking butter with huge explosions of sweet and spice.  Totally warm, no burn, everything bourbon should be.  Wish we'd been savvy enough to buy a case of this when it came out in 2008...

Vintage Bourbon 17 Year


Vintage Bourbon was a brand put out by Willett / Kentucky Bourbon Distillers at the height of the "bourbon glut" when there was an overflow of well aged bourbon and very little demand in the market.  There were several different Vintage bottlings - 17 and 21-year Vintage Bourbon as well as 21 and 23-Year Vintage Rye.  These bottles were dirt cheap when they came out, starting at around $60 retail.  Nowadays they're many hundreds of dollars on the secondary market.

Honestly given the ultra-rare status of this bottle, we weren't blown away.  It's a quality bourbon but there wasn't anything that left us crying ourselves to sleep since we don't have any in our collection.  Maybe it's just because we drank this right after the face melting awesomeness of the Parker's.  Anyway since we love everything Willett, we were psyched to get to try this one and it was a straight-ahead enjoyable bourbon.

Hirsch 12-Year Canadian Rye Whiskey


This one got many double-takes from the whiskey crowd.  Hirsch of course is known for the AH Hirsch selection from the original Pennsylvania Michter's / Pennco distillery.  But this is a completely unrelated bottle and one that we had no idea even existed.

We wouldn't have thought it was a rye, certainly not a Kentucky rye.  The Canadian angle makes more sense.  It was very light, delicate, utterly smooth with little hints of spice, olive oil, florals, and some perfume.  Maybe some malted barley in the mix here?  It's almost got a lowland single malt quality to it.

We Stopped Taking Notes After a While...

There were some others - an old Stitzel-Weller Pappy Van Winkle 15 Year and a Lot B 12 Year, some Smooth Ambler private barrels, some old Michter's rye, a beauteous old Highland Park.  Many of these we've reviewed in the past, but you get the idea... Absolute whiskey debauchery!

So, yeah it was quite a night.  It didn't hurt that the bbq brisket, jalapeno cole slaw, homemade bbq sauce, and banana cake were absolutely no joke.  Cigars, bourbon, and barbecue on the deck out in the Rockaways is old school New York goodness!

Cheers and thanks again to the Weinsteins for a great night!  /SB

Review: Smooth Ambler 8-Year Rye - Private Barrel Program of the Year

July 15, 2014

Review: Smooth Ambler 8-Year Rye - Private Barrel Program of the Year

The hottest private barrel program this year is Smooth Ambler's Old Scout Rye.  John Little and company have been dipping into their stash of LDI (Lawrenceburg Distillers, Indiana) rye and bottling eight year cask strength goodness for liquor outfits around the country.  These brilliant picks have been bottled for spots around the country like Astor Wines in New York, Kenwood Liquors in Chicago, and Red Dog Wine & Spirits in Nashville.  Basically anyone who's anyone has their own barrel of Smooth Ambler by now.

8-Year Single Barrel Cask Strength Smooth Ambler Old Scout Rye, 63.4% ABV

What Are Private Barrels?

We've been getting this question a lot lately, so here's a quick summary about private barrels.  Whiskey brands like Smooth Ambler, Four Roses, Willett, High West, Buffalo Trace, and Jefferson's distribute to retailers in a few different ways.  They sell cases of their standard bottles, for example Four Roses Small Batch or Buffalo Trace Bourbon.  They also sell limited release bottles which are allocated, like Four Roses 125th Anniversary and Buffalo Trace Antique Collection - of which stores would be lucky to get five or six bottles.

Another option for retail stores is to buy a whole barrel of whiskey.  Typically when a store buys a barrel, they're not literally purchasing a barrel full of whiskey.  In other words there's no man with a donkey cart rolling up and dropping a full barrel on their stoop.  The seller still takes care of the bottling, delivering cases of bottles to the store.  They will often use a custom label denoting who's chosen the barrel.  A barrel is anywhere from 100-250 bottles, so the store gets a big shipment of custom bottles from their private barrel.  Here are various private barrel labels of Smooth Ambler:



Kenwood Liquors and other private barrel picks (photo: Josh Nibert Photography)

In addition to liquor stores, various whiskey clubs, restaurants, and bars can also participate in the private barrel program. SmokyBeast hasn't (yet!) gotten to choose our own barrel, but it sounds like a fun task.  You either visit the producer or receive barrel pick samples in the mail.  Then you taste your way through all the available barrels until you find your ideal choice.  There are sometimes options of different proofs (cask strength vs standard proof), ages, recipes, and different finishes (whiskey that completed its aging in a port or sherry cask).  Liquor stores will sometimes request to keep the empty barrel for display purposes.

Private Barrel Display at Healthy Spirits 

Much like a great butcher will become famous for selecting the best cuts of meat, barrel selection is also an art form.  There are huge differences in barrels from the same distillery.  Some would say that the warehouse and barrel of a particular whiskey you're drinking is even more important than the age or the recipe.  You may also notice that very premium whiskies like Van Winkle, BTAC, or Willett can be the same age and from the same distillery as much cheaper bottles.  What is the difference?  Most likely proof and barrel selection...  We've done extensive "research" into drinking different Willett private barrels, and we can verify that there are gems of barrels that have been chosen by the wise zen master barrel pickers.  For this reason, private barrel programs become very hot, and when one shop's barrel is deemed to be very good, everyone wants to choose a barrel from that brand.

Astor Wines Smooth Ambler Private Barrel
One final note, we've been using words like "brand" and "producer" instead of "distillery" because many of these companies are NDPs (non-distiller producers).  In other words the barrels being selected were not distilled by Smooth Ambler or High West, they were sourced by them from one of the big distilleries.  In Smooth Ambler's case this is Lawrenceburg Distillers Indiana.  So in effect, they've been selected from a small subset of barrels that were already chosen via a similar process on a much larger scale.

Appalachian Whiskey Society Private Barrel (photo: Josh Nibert Photography)

This year's private Smooth Ambler barrel from Kenwood Liquors seems to have set the trend, and now stores are hot on Smooth Ambler picks.  While these private barrels won't reach the lunatic collectibility of the uber-aged Willett and Van Winkle private barrels, they are some of the best ryes to come out this year.  With a very reasonable price point ($45-$65 or so) there are a lot of people stocking up on these at the moment.


Tasting Notes - Smooth Ambler 8 Year Rye Single Barrel 63.4%

Nose:  Sweet buttered popcorn, mint, pops of vanilla, bbq sauce, oak, and a tiny hint of pickle brine. 

Palate:  Very drinkable, staying in the sweet category with mocha/cocoa, a little citrus, some hot chiles, oak & char.   

Finish:  Solid spirit warmth, a little more char/smoke, sweets and wood.  

Line of Smooth Ambler Whiskies (photo: Josh Nibert Photography)

Review

Just about everything Smooth Ambler has put out is pretty good.  The 7-year Old Scout Rye, and the 10-year Old Scout Bourbon are both worth picking up.  Their former releases of 11, 14, and 19-year Very Old Scout bottles were awesome.  But if you can get your hands on any of these cask strength private barrels, pull the trigger without hesitation.  Hopefully the success of the first run of this program will mean more honey barrel of SAOS coming soon!

It looks like San Francisco Wine Trading Company has a private Smooth Ambler barrel in stock now.  If you're interested, don't wait!

Cheers/SB


Review: Willett Small Batch 2-Year Rye, Willett 5-Year Rye - More Willett!  More more more!!!

July 7, 2014

Review: Willett Small Batch 2-Year Rye, Willett 5-Year Rye - More Willett! More more more!!!

Ok so we're admittedly smitten with Willett.  We struck gold with the 25-Year Rye.  LeNell's Red Hook was by far the greatest rye we'd ever tasted.  We got a tasting with private barrel legend Doug Philips. Even the Willett 4-year (sourced Indiana rye) won our best buy of 2012, for being an awesome barrel of cask strength goodness at under $40.

A couple of months ago we got a rare treat: a personal tour of Willett Distillery from Drew Kulsveen, master distiller.  Drew proudly poured us the first original Willett-distilled whiskey in over forty years.  Drilling right into the barrel to give us a taste, Drew mentioned in passing "this stuff is just a few months shy of being 'straight.'"  Of course he was referring to the regulations for straight rye whiskey, which must be aged for at least two years in new charred oak barrels.

Well it's a few months later and we were lucky enough to get our hands on some of the new 100% Willett-distilled Family Estate Small Batch Rye.  As a fitting pairing, we put it next to the new Willett 5-Year rye, which is likely a similar batch as the 4-year (LDI-sourced) rye only a year older.

The new Small Batch Rye on the left, and the 5-Year on the right
New Look

We notice a few immediate differences.  Willett has moved away from the handwritten labels and the beautiful hand-dipped wax seals and now has typed ABV and proof and a foil seal.  This is a sad turn of events.  Tearing through the wax was a beloved moment as you first opened a new bottle of Willett and got to nose what was inside.  Also the assorted wax colors just somehow added to the mystery and collectibility.  But hey, if this means that they're going to produce a lot more Willett and it's just prohibitively difficult to wax-dip each one, then that's a welcome development.  We also notice that they've moved to a synthetic cork, so perhaps there's some issue with wax-dipping here.  Anyway we'll sure miss the wonderful wax tops, but it's still a gorgeous presentation.  Thankfully they haven't messed with the classic WFE bottle design.

Old wax tops on the left and right, the new foil top in the middle.

Also the bottle and barrel aren't numbered.  Presumably a small batch can't be numbered, since it doesn't come from a single barrel.  However we've noticed that some of the new single barrels are also missing bottle numbers, which is a shame.  It doesn't really matter, but numbering the bottles and yield of a particular barrel is a strong sign of integrity for you as the consumer and we hope they continue to do it.


The 5-Year Label.  Notice the hand-written age, ABV, proof, and barrel number.

5-Year Rye Tasting Notes

Nose:  Solid big punchy rye nose with lots of cracking spice, some char, a hint of vanilla and mint.

Palate:  The taste confirms that this is a brother of the 4-year.  It's just a solid rye, very much in the zone for what a rye should be and fitting with a top LDI barrel pick.  Very drinkable, particularly at the high 110 proof.

Finish:  Not a particularly memorable finish, but again it's very smooth and drinkable with this much ABV and flavor.

The small batch label.  Moving to the typed/printed ABV & proof.

2-Year Small Batch Rye Tasting Notes

Nose:  The nose is sharp.  A big burst of mint, some tree bark, char, and shoe leather.  Some creaminess, like vanilla yogurt.  But it's definitely a "trebly" nose - meaning not a ton of depth and richness, and a lot of heat & spice in the top of the nose.

Palate:  Wow!  Don't let that nose fool you, it will get better over time as it picks up the wood.  But what they did with the taste is amazing.  Sweet with a lot of mint, some tea leaves, and butterscotch.  Very fresh tasting and floral.  There's a maturity that shouldn't be here at two years, and a complexity of flavor that is very pleasantly surprising.

Finish:  Clean finish with a little throat burn but a good balance of sweets, spice, and a little wood.

The 5-Year, left, showing Indiana provenance and hand written bottle/yield; Small batch on right.

The Straight Rye Skinny

Ok first of all it's difficult to be impartial once you've visited a place, met the great people who are involved, tasted the spirit before it's even ready for the bottle, and feel very connected to the story.  But we think that this new Willett product will be reviewed very highly even by folks who aren't as biased as us.  With so many brands sourcing from LDI, it's nice to taste something that's obviously a completely different animal.

The Family Estate Small Batch is a remarkable achievement for Willett. It has a lot of fresh flavors that speak to great care with the recipe and distillation process.  But it also has a richness that's striking considering its age.  We prefer it to the 5-year at less than half the age.  Also, for a small private operation using local ingredients, the price point of around $40/bottle is right where it should be.  We see a lot of small "craft" distillers trying to come to market with spirits that don't taste nearly this good and are priced up at $60 or $70.  While we prefer it neat, at this price you won't feel guilty adding an ice cube or making a truly exceptional cocktail if that's your thing.

Those 20+ year bad boys that we've been lucky enough to taste are still the stuff of dreams.  But granted that they're going for impossible four-digit figures, and that's if you're lucky enough to find them, we're thrilled to see some great and reasonable drinkers coming out of the new Wileltt.  You'd be lucky to pick up a bottle of this first Small Batch Rye.

Cheers/SB


Review: The Arran Malt Machrie Moor

July 1, 2014

Review: The Arran Malt Machrie Moor

Well we've had a few real highlights in recent weeks.  The crazy Willett tasting, some great tastes at Jewbilee, our Battle of the Beasts smoke-a-thon...  It's been a good run.  Sadly this week we've got something of a dud.  Consider it a warning for you peat-heads out there that might be looking for something new.

The Arran Malt Machrie Moor


The Arran Distillery was founded in 1995 and is the only whisky operation on the Isle of Arran.  Arran is an island directly west of Islay, but separated from the Hebrides by the Kintyre Peninsula (where the Cambeltown region is located).  One interesting thing about Arran is that part of the operation is a private barrel program where you as a consumer can own your own cask while it ages in their warehouses.

Today we're trying Machrie Moor, their peated expression.  Here's what they have to say about it:

"The Peated Arran. Lightly peated at 20ppm, this mythical malt has proved a popular addition to the Arran range. On the west coast of the Isle of Arran lies a windswept and mystical peat bog called Machrie Moor. Bronze Age stone circles and standing stones are strewn across its barren, undulating terrain. One of the stone circles is known as Fingal’s Cauldron Seat, where sits a stone with a carved hole. The legendary warrior giant Fingal is said to have tethered his favourite dog Bran to this stone. This peated expression of the Arran Single Malt perfectly captures the rugged beauty and lore of the landscape. Unleash the legend that is Machrie Moor."
Tasting Notes

Nose:  Something here immediately turns us off.  It's rubbery, and has something like rubber cement or white out mixed with a thick putrid greenhouse thing going on.  Like palm fronds (fronds?) There is a tiny hint of peat, but not anything that would make us think this was the "peated" expression.

Palate:  It's consistent with the nose, overly oily without much flavor or smoke to back it up.  It's very white-oak tasting without much char.  Sort of like the opposite that we look for in a new beast...

Finish:  Unremarkable.  Where's the smoke?  This is milder than many malts that don't even claim to be peated.

Review:  We can't say this malt is "bad".  It is quite smooth.  But it's not for us.  Decidedly, not for us.  Something is really weird here.  There's like this vegetal oily thing going on.  Have you ever had hearts of palm from a salad bar or a can that have sat around too long and they're all gross and white and mushy.  That's kind of like this whisky.

Review

It's a "C-" from SmokyBeast.  Look elsewhere if you're a peat lover.  If you're really looking for a lightly peated malt, you're probably better off with something like a Talisker or Highland Park.  Maybe go with a Bunnahabhain or Bowmore.  This one is off-putting.  Are there any Machrie Moor lovers out there?  We'd love to hear from you and maybe there's an element to this one that we're missing.

Cheers/SB